Ratnadip Choudhury
Imphal
Photos: RK Suresh
Manipur quietly waits for a crisis to unfold
yet again with the 3.5 lakh strong Kuki community demanding a separate
Kuki state, a Kukiland, to be curved out of Manipur. The demand is being
vehemently opposed by other ethnic groups, making space for another
conflict in a state known for its fragile ethnic divide.
Ever since Manipur
faced an economic blockade last year in demand of a separate district in
the Kuki heartland of Sadar Hills, the chasm between the hill and the
valley has widened further on lines of ethnicity. The blockade lasted
more than hundred days, with the Central and state governments doing
almost nothing to end the standoff.
Imphal
The Nagas, the second
largest ethnic group of Manipur after the Meiteis, have been asking for a
separate administrative set up, with the United Naga Council (UNC)
spearheading the movement. In the Imphal valley, people consider UNC’s
agenda as more of a shadow of National Socialist Council of Nagaland
(NSCN-IM) demand of greater Nagaland that will include the Naga villages
of Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. The Meiteis, whether
intellectual groups, or the from the underground or the common man on
streets, all in one voice oppose the idea and Manipur has already seen
enough protest warning New Delhi not to compromise with the landlocked
state’s territorial integrity.
The Kukis are following
the footsteps of the Nagas. The Kuki State Demand Committee (KDSC)
feels that it is high time to protect the land of the Kuki tribe. They
have sent a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. “We want to
sever all ties with the Manipur government which is trying to encroach
upon the land of the Kukis by instituting various incriminating laws
such as the Manipur Land Regulation Act. Hence the Kuki people want a
separate Kuki state and the KSDC is representing the will and wants of
the people,” says K Khongsai, spokesperson KSDC. The KSDC also lamented
the Manipur Land Revenue Act as an incriminating ‘attack administration’
to undermine the customary institutions and land holding system of the
Kuki community.
The Kukis for long have
been angry about the Manipur government keeping them deprived. “Thus
the Kukis are compelled to seek a separate state to preserve our land,
identity and culture. If we peep into history we will find that Kuki
inhabited areas of Manipur made for a separate entity outside the
kingdom of Manipur, when Manipur was an erstwhile princely state. The
Kuki National Assembly which was established in 1960 submitted a
memorandum demanding a separate Kuki state to the then Prime Minister
Jawaharlal Nehru on 24 March 1960,” Khongsai adds.
In a bid to draw
attention from the Union home ministry, the KSDC has already called for a
72-hour general strike across the Kuki-inhabited areas of Manipur from
12 to 15 May. The renewed demand for a separate state came even as the
Union government is reportedly trying to appease the NSCN (IM) with a
purported Greater Naga state.
The fact that the fresh
impetus to the Kuki land demand comes at a time when nearly 20 Kuki
militant groups, who had once waged armed rebellion for a separate state
demand, have signed a suspension of operation agreement with the
Manipur government and the Centre, and are insisting for a political
talk in parallel with the GOI – NSCN (IM) peace parley that had entered
its 15thyear, is significant.
Supporting the demand
of a Kuki state, some of the Kuki militant groups currently in truce
with both the Union government and the government of Manipur have
threatened to pull out of the ‘suspension of operation’ agreement while
urging New Delhi to acknowledge the demand and establish a meaningful
and purposeful dialogue with concerned Kuki groups. If they take up arms
once again, violence might flare up in the hills of Manipur. The Kukis
are already haunted by memories of fierce ethnic clashes with Nagas on
numerous occasions.
Meanwhile, the KSDC has
asked the Union government to find a ‘political solution’ for the
demand of the Kuki community in the region for self determination within
the constitutional framework of the country while warning of intense
agitations in the coming days. Khongsai says, “We don’t want any hand or
opinion on the issues of other communities but the Indian government
must not distinguish or differentiate between the grievances of the Kuki
community and other tribal communities.” In a bid to increase its
pressure, the KSDC is reportedly mobilising the issue within and outside
the civil societies in the Kuki inhabited areas of Manipur.
It seems it is high
time for the Centre to look into a new strategy of mitigating crisis
situations in Manipur. Its effort to lend an ear to one demand of
statehood is inviting many other ethnic groups to air their grievances,
and push for their demands. The Centre should act before the unique
diversity of Manipur suffers another blow.
With inputs from RK Suresh in Imphal
Ratnadip Choudhury is a Principal Correspondent with Tehelka.ratnadip@tehelka.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment