New Delhi:
The forest advisory committee (FAC) of the environment ministry has
recommended that the 1,500 MW Tipaimukh hydroelectric project in Manipur
shouldn’t be given forest clearance, potentially killing a project that
has met with criticism over its heavy environmental and social costs.
Environment
minister Jayanthi Natarajan will take a final decision on the fate of
the project. The North Eastern Electric Power Corp. Ltd’s project would
have involved felling more than 7.8 million trees in Manipur alone and
diverting 22,777.50 hectares of forest land, according to the committee.
The
number of trees that would be cut wasn’t justified, said a senior
environment ministry official who didn’t want to be identified.
“The
ministry diverts around 25,000-30,000 hectares of forest land annually
for various projects, including mining, power projects, roads and
others. This project alone needed diversion of 22,777.50 hectares of
forest land and hence it was not feasible,” he said.
FAC
recommended instead that the user agency explore the feasibility of
smaller dams involving the diversion of smaller forest areas
commensurate with their power generation capacity. Even Bangladesh has
expressed reservations over the project.
This
comes as the share of hydropower in India’s energy basket has been
dwindling. Hydro is seen as an important source of energy to meet
India’s mounting needs but—at 39,623.40MW—makes up only 17.6% of the
nation’s installed power generation capacity of 225,133.10MW. Thermal
power, generated by fossil fuel, accounts for 67.5% of the total. “There
are a lot of problems with the project, primarily the huge amount of
land that had to be diverted,” said a senior power ministry official on
condition of anonymity.
The
minutes of the FAC meeting, held on 11 and 12 July, that were made
public on Thursday, showed that there were repeated requests from the
power ministry and the user agency to expedite a decision on the
project.
“The
FAC after detailed deliberations concluded that requirement of forest
land for the project is large and is disproportionate to its power
generation capacity. Also very high ecological, environmental and social
impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forest land will far
outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC,
therefore, strongly recommended that approval for diversion of the said
forest land should not be accorded,” the minutes said.
The
minutes said the project calls for the diversion of 1,551.60 hectares of
forest land in Mizoram as well. “This project thus requires 24,329
hectares of forest land, which is more than one-fifth of the total
118,184 hectares of forest land diverted for execution of 497 hydel
project in the entire country after the FC (forest conservation) Act
came into force,” the minutes said.
The
Tipaimukh project was to be located 500m downstream of the confluence of
the rivers Tuivai and Barak, near the Manipur-Mizoram border.
The
forest land required for the project was more than 100 times the average
rate of such diversion for hydel projects that had been accorded
approval under the FC Act by the ministry of environment and forests
thus far, according to the minutes of the meeting.
FAC also said that the forest was also home to several endangered species of flora and fauna.
It
said the project involves the displacement of 12 villages with 557
families and a population of 2,027 members of scheduled tribes in
Manipur.
S.P. Sen, a former director (technical) at NHPC Ltd, said the power project wouldn’t have been commercially viable.
“Company
wouldn’t have made money. The project cost would have been much higher
than the tariff which can be approved by CERC (Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission). Days of distress to people because of a project
are over and now it is impossible to build a project at the cost of
human beings,” Sen said.
Sen,
who is also the vice- chairman, technical committee, on river basin
management, at the International Commission on Large Dams, Paris, said
the project would have involved a large area being submerged. Dams
should be built for the people living in the area and not for those
living in far away cities, he said.
“The
regular employment likely to be generated from the project is only 826
persons. Therefore, it appears that employment opportunities likely to
be created by the project are not commensurate with the loss of land and
natural resources, which are generally the main source of livelihood of
the tribal population of the state,” the FAC minutes said.